Wikipidia:Lawang bubuhan

Bot policy

Hello. To facilitate steward granting of bot access, I suggest implementing the standard bot policy on this wiki. In particular, this policy allows stewards to automatically flag known interlanguage linking bots (if this page says that is acceptable), which form the vast majority of such requests. The policy also enables global bots on this wiki (if this page says that is acceptable), which are trusted bots that will be given bot access on every wiki that allows global bots.

This policy makes bot access requesting much easier for local users, operators, and stewards. To implement it we only need to create a redirect to this page from Project:Bot policy, and add a line at the top noting that it is used here. Please read the text at m:Bot policy before commenting. If you object, please say so; I hope to implement in two weeks if there is no objection, since it is particularly written to streamline bot requests on wikis with little or no community interested in bot access requests. Xqt 22:21, 20 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)

1.  HakunKenrick95 18:19, 27 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)
2.  HakunCarsrac 00:34, 28 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)

Xqbot

Xqbot doesn't know how to do (well) its so-called "cosmetic changes" (actually a kind of vandalism), but it is a "global bot". I don't want to see here these so-called "cosmetic changes". --Budelberger 22:35, 31 Uktubir 2010 (ICT) (). (ArthurBot, TXiKiBoT, VolkovBot... are good bots.)

The discussion is not about Xqbot, but about the local bot policy. Carsrac 16:58, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT)

But local bot policy will give rights to the worst bot I've ever seen, Xqbot. --Budelberger 17:12, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT) (). (ArthurBot, TXiKiBoT, VolkovBot and a few other are good bots.)

Budelberger, please stop stalking me. Xqt 20:48, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT)

Are you, you : Xqt, Xqbot ? No. I'm talking about the worst bot I've ever seen, your bot ; why have you deactivated "your" so-called "cosmetic changes" on simple.Wp if in your poor own opinion -- removing categorizing templates, etc. -- they are correct ?... --Budelberger 21:27, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT) (). (Because DJSasso has the power to block it on simple. Alas ! ty, cdo, hak and poor other Wikipedias don't have a clever DJSasso to stop vandalisms.) (Ask TXiKi or Volkov to teach you how good first quality bots work well.)

If you have any remarks according the bot please use our bug tracker. Since I am member of the development group and mw coder I am interested fixing errors if there are some. But unqualified statements not very helpful in this matter. (eod) Xqt 22:10, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT)

Request for sysop access

Ezagren

I would like to request for sysop access in this Banjar Wikipedia. I would like to improve on:

• MediaWiki for Banjar Wikipedia
• designing and protecting front page
• increasing the edit keys
• protecting vandalized articles

Thank you. --Ezagren ^bapandir 23:42, 26 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)

You "would like to improve"... I don't think so ; bjn.Wikipedia was not ready to leave Incubator (keywords were translated not in Banjar, but in Indonesian, see here) but it did : is it time "to improve on MediaWiki for Banjar Wikipedia" ?... Wp/bjn was approved by experts... I think that you want, as many others, own your Wikipedia, your Private Wikipedia, where you may revert and delete others' edits, protect your articles (all bjn articles are yours), and block other users, except a few friends (Amdf, who has a Gaul in Wp/mrj ?... That's what you want ? to be the Banjar Amdf ?). Your first edit as Administrateur ? "protect" (that is : "block") "Main Page" and its templates... --Budelberger 23:06, 31 Uktubir 2010 (ICT) (). (A good Wikipedia working well is a Wikipedia without any Administrateur.)

Handak ikam itu apa gerang? Ulun kada mangarti. Wikipidia ini ampun samunyaan urang. Ezagren ^bapandir 13:43, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT)

Before requesting to own a Wikipedia (Oooops ! "sysop access"...), you have to learn some magic words, you and your clever friend Erik Anggara. --Budelberger 16:51, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT) ().

Oooops, sorry! I miss it. I know it. Ezagren ^bapandir 17:42, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT)

I'm very proud to have taught you how to use some magic words : I think in a few years, you'll be able to ask for owning your own Private Wikipedia, your so-called "sysop access". --Budelberger 19:06, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT) (). (Do you ask others before adding your "bjn" in Main Pages ?... No, of course ; but you don't like to have small languages in your own Private Property. For others to, Banjar language is a small language, but your racialist rules have not spread everywhere.) (You are right : removing "includeonly" pair in a template is not a "stupid edit" ; I give to you and your friend Anggara a Star.)

Instead I do not know, but "include" it only just missed from editing. Sometime I'll make Wikipidia:BintangWiki. Me and my friends have tried to make this Banjar Wikipedia, so it is okay if I volunteered to be sysop for Banjar Wikipedia become better and organized. I volunteered as a sysop is also on the advice of fellow users in Wikipedia. --Ezagren ^bapandir 20:19, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT)

Banjar.Wp had to be well organized and written in Banjar -- not in Indonesian -- in Incubator, not here. What was not done in Incubator will be done here, with and by the same Dream Team ?... --Budelberger 21:38, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT) (). (You revert first, and don't think after reverting, missing some magic words meanwhile ; that's why you want "sysop access".)

Saya tidak mengerti jalan pikiran Anda. Sorry! --Ezagren ^bapandir 22:03, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT)

Hakun

1.  Hakun --J Subhi ^{”pamandiran”} 05:13, 27 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)
2.  Hakun --Alamnirvana^pamandiran 17:15, 27 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)
3.  Hakun --Mimihitam 18:11, 27 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)
4.  Hakun --Kenrick95 18:19, 27 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)
5.  Hakun --BlackKnight 23:30, 27 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)
6.  Hakun --39Agung 23:33, 27 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)
7.  Hakun --Carsrac 00:35, 28 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)
8.  Hakun --Alagos 02:44, 28 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)
9.  Hakun --M. Adiputra 19:27, 28 Uktubir 2010 (ICT)

Something strange

See here, here, here, here and here.

Budelberger 17:03, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT) ().

I think no matter. --Ezagren ^bapandir 20:12, 1 Nupimbir 2010 (ICT)